Reviewed
by William H. Peck, University of Michigan-Dearborn
[The Table of Contents is listed below.]
This book has two principal themes. One is a biography of Jean-François
Champollion; the other details the steps to the modern decipherment of ancient
Egyptian. Champollion’s life as an ardent student of ancient Egypt encouraged
by his older brother and returning members of Bonaparte’s expedition was
eventually rewarded with an assistant professorship of history at the university
in Grenoble in 1809. His publication of L’Égypte sous le Pharaons in
1814 was produced long before he could successfully read the language. His
summery of his dramatic breakthrough in the decipherment came in 1822 in his Lettre
à M. Dacier which was followed by a more detailed exposition two years
later. Champollion was able to put his knowledge to practical use in the joint
Franco- Tuscan expedition of 1828-30 where scholars were able to identify the
royal names on monuments with some security. Champollion’s short life of only
41 years was a continuous adventure both intellectual and political befitting
the complexity of his eventual accomplishments. A linguistic prodigy, he had
begun a study of Coptic in his teens, a language that would prove crucial to his
work on ancient Egyptian.
In chapter one Robinson briefly surveys the history of attempts to decipher
Egyptian. The most general misconception about the language was that each sign
in hieroglyphic script represented a thought or an idea. That it was partly
alphabetical, partly ideographic, and partly representative of signs of
classification had not to that time occurred to any western investigator
immersed in languages that were essentially alphabetical. It was the slow
realization by several people during the first quarter of the nineteenth
century of the varied uses of the signs that the author has explained with care
and detailed examination. The first assumption, that the cartouches, elongated
ovals, might contain the names of royalty spelled phonetically, proved to be
correct but it was still a far reach to distinguish the varied ways the signs
were employed and combined. Robinson has provided an explanation of the
tentative steps taken by of Champollion, as well as the others involved, that
explains that deciphering the language was not accomplished in a single moment
of inspiration but over a period of years by trial and error.